Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [Proposal] Make FW occupancy depend on pvp not pve. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Nice ideas. There would need to be fewer plexes necessary, I think, but make them take longer. I agree that spamming plexes in small ships could be annoying (noobship alts anyone? easy to kill, but not in 50 places at once). Thus make each plex ta...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2010.06.08 03:23:00
|
2. [Proposal] CCP, commit to excellence. No features left behind. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supporting asking CCP to fix stuff without ranting like a 3 year old. Thank you.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2010.05.31 15:50:00
|
3. tactical overview option for solo/small gangs: Ship Velocity Vectors - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
+1. It should stay the same size with zoom, otherwise you won't be able to see it at either end (either off the screen or too small). It should turn on/off with tactical overlay.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2010.05.28 19:40:00
|
4. Outstanding Faction Warfare Bugs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The timer exploit is the worst, because they can't even claim that's a feature. Fix all 3 ASAP.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.06.23 13:23:00
|
5. Give the caldari medal to pilots enrolled in FW on date of capture! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Let it be so.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.06.19 00:34:00
|
6. [Issue] FW can't use hics and dictors in 0.0 because of standings hit. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar Originally by: Drake Draconis Uh... last I heard... 0.0 is lawless... so how the hell are you getting a standings hit in a non-patrolled let alone "we don't give a rip unless you kill rats" 0.0 space?...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.05.05 00:08:00
|
7. [issue] Drones need to inherit Milita and Fleet states - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
This. 'Nuff said.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.05.05 00:04:00
|
8. [Proposal] More 'Fluff' Ships - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Tzar'rim Dead universe is dead, making it more lively makes it more fun.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.04.05 13:57:00
|
9. [Proposal] Faction Warfare Improvements - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
This. I especially like C (though it has been proposed before), D, and E.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.04.05 13:54:00
|
10. More orbit range options. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yes.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.04.05 13:50:00
|
11. [REQUEST] - Option to have a "Fast" view while docked - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Tzar'rim Don't need it, don't use it but it's a valid request and there's no reason to had it removed in the first place.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.04.04 15:10:00
|
12. Alliance management controls and tools proposals - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
1. Yep. 2. Nope. Or at least make it optional. I like how standings are internal - you could set somebody red and tell them they are blue and they will never know (until they get attacked that is). 3. Yep. 4. Just make it possible to set the MO...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.03.22 01:20:00
|
13. Cloak Interdiction - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Interesting concept, I support at least looking into it.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.03.08 00:28:00
|
14. Low Sec Cyno Generators -- adding a new dimention to eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Good idea! A few more: I would make the spawn just random on-grid from the station instead of a discrete all-or-nothing system. I also don't see the purpose of the sec penalty. Finally, maybe it could be made such that you must wait 1 minute befo...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.02.04 23:30:00
|
15. Distress Beacons - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Efrim Black Originally by: chatgris While I admit to being somewhat of a carebear, I am definitely of the opinion that pirates could respond exactly the same as any other player in the system. I had previously state...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.02.04 00:56:00
|
16. [Proposal] Filtered Local - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Cool idea. This would be really nice and also save a lot of scrolling when counting wartargets. Supported. You might want a new title - I have to admit I thought you wanted a spam/language filter in local!
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.02.04 00:53:00
|
17. [Proposal] Low Security Systems Change (Player Intervention) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Interesting idea. I don't think I support the idea of bookmarks and bonuses, just because they seem really artificial and a bit too special, but a special group which can attack pirates in lowsec without sec hits would be nice. Maybe something lik...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.02.04 00:51:00
|
18. [Idea] Dynamic Security Status - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: eliminator2 i just lawled if ccp goes with this then just lawl this will actually goin way towards wow in safe place nerfing pvp since people will make loads of alts just to kill rats to make it safe or wat not but on anot...
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.02.03 00:03:00
|
19. [Idea] Dynamic Security Status - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
*Hereon Herinnger bumps!
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.02.01 15:13:00
|
20. [Idea] Dynamic Security Status - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Kaya Divine Can be easily exploited, not supported. Elaborate? It would take time to change system sec and if balanced right such an "exploit" as deliberately changing sec would be perfectly acceptable.
- by Hereon Herinnger - at 2009.01.30 01:10:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |